And even if theyre still frustrating, pitchers at least know to expect them.But as was the case for years even prior to MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred considered the usage of foreign compounds an “unfair competitive benefit,” managers can still urge umpires to inspect an opposing pitcher if said pitcher is doing something suspicious. As Hannah Keyser of Yahoo Sports kept in mind, MLBs memo on the foreign-substance restriction actually does consist of possible penalty for supervisors who dont act in great faith: Hannah Keyser @HannahRKeyserFrom MLBs memo to teams last week:<< br><> < br>>”Please keep in mind that a manager will be subject to discipline if he makes the request in bad faith (e.g., a request intended to disrupt the pitcher in a crucial game scenario, a routine demand that is not based on observable proof, and so on)”But unless Statcast is unexpectedly capable of determining a supervisors faith level like it can, state, leave velocity and spin rate, this is eventually a subjective call. Another would be subjecting the angering supervisor to the same punishment as pitchers who do get caught with a foreign substance: an automatic ejection and a 10-game suspension.The One Silver Lining of Tuesdays SillinessOn the plus side, now we know that umpires arent about to start giving pitchers the ol heave-ho on account of sweat and rosin.The question of whether they would initially emerged when MLB granted an exception for rosin under its new foreign-substances rule however with the specification that pitchers “may not purposefully integrate rosin with other substances (e.g., sunscreen) to create extra tackiness or they run the risk of ejection and suspension.

Scherzer provided Girardi an intense staredown as he walked off the mound at the end of the 4th, and the Phillies second-year skipper was ultimately ejected after leaving his dugout to scream at coaches in the opposing dugout: FOX Sports: MLB @MLBONFOXAfter being inspected for sticky compound 3 times this evening, Max Scherzer stared down Phillies Manager Joe Girardi while walking to the dugout. And even if theyre still annoying, pitchers at least know to anticipate them.But as was the case for years even prior to MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred deemed the usage of foreign compounds an “unfair competitive advantage,” supervisors can still urge umpires to inspect an opposing pitcher if stated pitcher is doing something suspicious. As Hannah Keyser of Yahoo Sports kept in mind, MLBs memo on the foreign-substance ban in fact does include possible penalty for managers who dont act in excellent faith: Hannah Keyser @HannahRKeyserFrom MLBs memo to teams last week:<< br><> < br>>”Please keep in mind that a manager will be subject to discipline if he makes the request in bad faith (e.g., a demand intended to interfere with the pitcher in an important game scenario, a routine request that is not based on observable proof, and so on)”But unless Statcast is all of a sudden capable of measuring a supervisors faith level like it can, state, exit velocity and spin rate, this is ultimately a subjective call. Another would be subjecting the angering supervisor to the exact same penalty as pitchers who do get captured with a foreign compound: an automated ejection and a 10-game suspension.The One Silver Lining of Tuesdays SillinessOn the plus side, now we understand that umpires arent about to start offering pitchers the ol heave-ho on account of sweat and rosin.The concern of whether they would first emerged when MLB approved an exception for rosin under its brand-new foreign-substances guideline but with the stipulation that pitchers “might not purposefully integrate rosin with other substances (e.g., sun block) to develop extra tackiness or they risk ejection and suspension. Its just baseball with added dosages of agitated pitchers and conniving managers, which are things that no one asked for.Stats courtesy of Baseball Reference and Baseball Savant.